A friend of mine had a mentor — a partner at one of the major consulting firms. Experienced, sharp, someone who had seen enough of the business world to have lost most of his illusions about it. One day, early in my friend's career, the partner gave him a piece of advice that stayed with both of them.
"You need to know which kind of animal you are in working life."
Not what your strengths are. Not what your values are. Which animal you are. Because the business world is a forest — and in a forest, what matters is not what you deserve. It is what you are, and whether you understand the terrain well enough to survive in it.
· · ·
We grew up believing the lion is king. Strong, fearless, respected. The one who leads because of what he is, not what he pretends to be. The business world reinforced this — the visionary founder, the decisive CEO, the leader who walks into a room and changes its energy. Forbes covers. TED talks. Harvard case studies. The origin myth told and retold until it hardens into legend.
The story is wrong. Not entirely — there are lions in business life, genuine ones. But they are not as common as the mythology suggests. And they are frequently not the ones at the top.
Let me tell you what I actually saw over twenty-five years. Not theory. Not archetypes from a management book. What I witnessed with my own eyes, in real rooms, in real organisations.
· · ·
I was dealing with a difficult situation at the top of an organisation. Something was wrong — I could feel it before I could prove it. My manager was feeding information to the board against me. Selectively, carefully, with the precision of someone who had been doing it for a while.
I tried to reach a board member directly. I did not know, at the time, the nature of the relationship between them. I found out later. The information I was sending upward was not staying in the office. Let me put it this way — my emails were likely being discussed somewhere considerably more intimate than a boardroom. Pillow talk about quarterly strategy. I have laughed about it since.
By the time I understood the full picture, the moves had already been made. That is how it works when you do not know which animals are in the room with each other — and which rooms they share.
I watched someone climb. Intelligent, patient, always knowing which relationship to invest in and when. In that particular forest, proximity to power was worth more than performance. She understood this earlier than most.
She is a CEO now. She sits on a board — one of those seats that gets filled when a company needs to demonstrate something publicly. She is mentioned in articles about women in leadership.
I watched how she got there. I will leave the details where I left them — in the rooms where they happened. But I will say this: the story being told publicly and the story I witnessed are not the same story. They rarely are.
I watched colleagues carry words between executives like currency — not information, currency. Telling one person what another person had said, carefully edited for maximum effect, then carrying the response back. No value created. No work done. Pure positioning, executed with patience and precision over months. The people doing this were not unintelligent. They were playing the game they had identified as the real game. In certain organisations, they were right.
I watched HR processes used as weapons. Someone who needed to be removed — not for performance reasons, for personal ones — suddenly found themselves on a performance improvement plan. The paperwork was impeccable. The process was followed to the letter. The outcome was predetermined. I have seen grown adults reduced to writing detailed accounts of things that never happened, defending themselves against accusations assembled with the care of a legal brief, while the person who assembled them sat in meetings and smiled. A twenty-two year old fresh graduate joining their first company cannot imagine this exists. I could not have imagined it either, once.
I am not describing exceptional cases. I am describing what I observed consistently, across different organisations, different countries, different industries. The specific names and details are different. The dynamics are the same.
· · ·
There is a scene in Andor — the Star Wars series — that I have not stopped thinking about. A group of prisoners are trying to escape. They reach water. It is the only way out. One of them turns to another and says: I cannot swim.
The response is not reassurance. It is not a plan. Everyone starts shouting — one way out, one way out. And the way out is the water. You either go in or you do not. Knowing how to swim is not the question. The question is whether you move.
The animals I described above — the ones who climbed through relationships, who carried words, who assembled HR cases — they all share one quality. They do not hesitate. They see what needs to be done, in the world they are actually in rather than the world they were told they were in, and they do it. The people who struggle in the corporate forest are often not the least capable. They are the ones who hesitate because the game being played is not the game they were prepared for. They cannot swim. And they spend too long saying so instead of jumping.
· · ·
I could quote Machiavelli. Everyone does. But Machiavelli observed power from the outside — after he had already lost his.
50 Cent learned it from inside an environment where misreading a situation did not cost you a promotion. It cost you everything. That kind of intelligence is different. And considerably more useful when the moves are being made against you.
Robert Greene and 50 Cent wrote The 50th Law together — a book about power drawn from 50 Cent's experience surviving environments where the rules were never what they appeared to be. The central argument: the greatest power is the ability to need nothing from the world. Once you reach that point, you cannot be manipulated. You cannot be used.
|
"The greatest power you can have in this world is the ability to not need anything from it. Once you reach this point, you cannot be manipulated. You cannot be used." — 50 Cent and Robert Greene, The 50th Law (2009) |
Fear is the primary instrument of control in any corporate environment. Fear of losing the job. Fear of the performance review. Fear of being seen to disagree. The animals who operate most effectively in the forest — whatever their method — are the ones who have made their peace with the worst case. They are not fearless in the sense of feeling nothing. They are fearless in the sense of not letting fear determine their moves.
The good people — the genuine ones — often lose not because they lack capability but because they are playing the wrong game. They think the game is about results. The actual game, in most organisations, is about power. You can be the best performer in the building and lose consistently to someone who understands power better than you do. I watched this happen. More than once. To people who deserved better. In a forest that did not care what they deserved.
· · ·
So which animal am I?
An eagle, I think. Not because I am the most impressive animal in the forest — I am not. But because what I do is see. I read the room. I notice what is happening underneath what is being said. I can map the dynamics of a new organisation within weeks — who holds real power, who is positioning, who is carrying words, who is building something genuine and who is performing the building of it.
The eagle's problem is that seeing clearly is not the same as surviving well. I am strategic and I am not afraid — I will take a position and defend it. But I am not a fox. I do not manipulate. I do not move through the forest by charm or deception. I protect the people under my responsibility, which has made me enemies among those who would prefer those people unprotected. And sometimes I have jumped when I could not swim — not always gracefully, but always.
The eagle does not thrive in every forest. A forest where perception matters more than reality, where the word-carriers set the agenda, where the game is entirely political — that is not a forest where the eagle's advantages matter much. Knowing this earlier would have saved me significant energy spent in the wrong terrain.
· · ·
The conclusion is not that everyone at the top is corrupt and the good people always lose. That is too simple and too wrong. There are genuinely good people in leadership. They exist. They are just rarer than the mythology suggests, and they work harder than their counterparts who play the game more freely.
The conclusion is: stop waiting for heroes. Stop admiring the title. Stop comparing yourself to people you do not know by heart — because you do not know which forest they navigated to get there, or what they did in it, or what it cost them and the people around them.
What you can know is which animal you are. What you bring. What you will and will not do. Which forests suit your nature and which ones will grind you down. And whether, when you reach the water with no time left, you are willing to jump.
That self-knowledge is worth more than any strategy, any mentor's advice, any book on power. It is the thing the consulting partner was trying to give my friend — not a formula, not a map. Just the right question, asked early enough to matter.
Which animal are you?
|
This week's insight The business world is a forest and the animals at the top are not always the ones the mythology says they are. Stop admiring the cover. Start knowing which animal you are — what you bring, what you will not do, which forests suit you and which ones will cost you more than you want to pay. That self-knowledge is not cynicism. It is the only honest map of the terrain you are actually navigating. And when you reach the water — jump. Even if you cannot swim. |
If this landed, there is one piece every week at stillnavigating.com — honest writing about the stuck middle, from someone still in it.